from The Wall Street Journal
Dec. 18, 2008
"Harry Markopolos, who once worked in a trading firm that competed with Bernard Madoff's, for nine years has been trying to persuade staffer after staffer at the Securities and Exchange Commission that Mr. Madoff's operation was a fraud. The agency never brought charges."
"A week after Mr. Madoff was arrested in an alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme, Mr. Markopolos was vindicated. Internal SEC documents show how the agency, prompted in 2006 to investigate by Mr. Markopolos's complaints, found serious violations at Mr. Madoff's firm, but took no public action. These documents show the SEC found some violations at Mr. Madoff's firm in 2006-07, but didn't take action on allegations that it was a Ponzi scheme."
How about some true oversight of our financial markets?! How can any investor have any semblance of confidence when the nation's financial watchdogs screwed things up so badly?!The SEC has been completely asleep at the wheel on this and other matters. This is, in one word....disgusting.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Sunday, December 14, 2008
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!
On Wall Street, there's no such thing as easy money or risk less investments. If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Case in point, take the dramatic fall of one of Wall Street's alleged top brokers Bernard Madoff who, as we have recently learned, bilked billions from countless ultra net worth (and supposedly highly sophisticated) investors through an intricate, multi billion dollar Ponzi scheme--one of the biggest cases of securities fraud in modern history!
(From the Wall Street Journal on December 12, 2008)
"Mr. Madoff's asset-management business appealed to investors for its remarkably steady returns for investing in the stock market. His investors consistently enjoyed small monthly gains, usually between zero and 2%. Mr. Madoff told investors his strategy was to trade in and out of large-cap stocks and buy options on those shares to help smooth the ups and downs. When he failed to see opportunities in the market, he would shift to U.S. Treasuries, according to fund marketing documents and people familiar with his strategy."
"Mr. Madoff's Fairfield Sentry Ltd., a hedge fund run by Madoff Investment Services to invest in shares in the S&P 100, claimed to be up 5.6% through the end of November, a period when the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index was down 37.65%. In October, Fairfield Sentry was said to be down 0.06%, a month when the S&P 500 lost 16.8%. Since its inception in December 1990, the fund averaged a 10.5% annual return, according to fund documents."
"Bernie Madoff's returns aren't real and if they are real, then they would almost certainly have been generated by front-running customer order flow from the broker-dealer arm of Madoff Investment Securities LLC," Mr. Markopolos wrote to the SEC in November 2005.The SEC declined to comment on the matter."
As a financial advisor, please heed my suggestion--never do business with a financial professional who does not separate the custody function from the advice function. More importantly, if you do not know what the advisor is buying on your behalf, find out. This lack of transparency, or "black box model" of investing is one my biggest reservations about investing in hedge funds. I suspect that many investors are going to start asking many more questions of their managers and might be much less tolerant of black box managers in the future.
The WSJ article continued to say:
"Mr. Madoff's investors described their shock and panic on Thursday. Susan Leavitt of Tampa Bay, Fla., said she had several million dollars of inherited money invested in the firm and added $500,000 earlier this year. A stay-at-home mother with two children, the 46-year-old Ms. Leavitt says she is considering going back to work. "That was my nest egg for the children, and my future. I'll never see much back, I'm sure," she said. Ms. Leavitt said she recently discussed her investment with a friend who told her he was suspicious about the firm's ability to generate such profits amid the economic crisis. "I thought, 'He's probably just jealous,' " said Ms. Leavitt. "We've been with [Mr. Madoff] for 15 years, and it's grown every year at 10%."
I'll close this entry just as I started it:
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!
Case in point, take the dramatic fall of one of Wall Street's alleged top brokers Bernard Madoff who, as we have recently learned, bilked billions from countless ultra net worth (and supposedly highly sophisticated) investors through an intricate, multi billion dollar Ponzi scheme--one of the biggest cases of securities fraud in modern history!
(From the Wall Street Journal on December 12, 2008)
"Mr. Madoff's asset-management business appealed to investors for its remarkably steady returns for investing in the stock market. His investors consistently enjoyed small monthly gains, usually between zero and 2%. Mr. Madoff told investors his strategy was to trade in and out of large-cap stocks and buy options on those shares to help smooth the ups and downs. When he failed to see opportunities in the market, he would shift to U.S. Treasuries, according to fund marketing documents and people familiar with his strategy."
"Mr. Madoff's Fairfield Sentry Ltd., a hedge fund run by Madoff Investment Services to invest in shares in the S&P 100, claimed to be up 5.6% through the end of November, a period when the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index was down 37.65%. In October, Fairfield Sentry was said to be down 0.06%, a month when the S&P 500 lost 16.8%. Since its inception in December 1990, the fund averaged a 10.5% annual return, according to fund documents."
"Bernie Madoff's returns aren't real and if they are real, then they would almost certainly have been generated by front-running customer order flow from the broker-dealer arm of Madoff Investment Securities LLC," Mr. Markopolos wrote to the SEC in November 2005.The SEC declined to comment on the matter."
As a financial advisor, please heed my suggestion--never do business with a financial professional who does not separate the custody function from the advice function. More importantly, if you do not know what the advisor is buying on your behalf, find out. This lack of transparency, or "black box model" of investing is one my biggest reservations about investing in hedge funds. I suspect that many investors are going to start asking many more questions of their managers and might be much less tolerant of black box managers in the future.
The WSJ article continued to say:
"Mr. Madoff's investors described their shock and panic on Thursday. Susan Leavitt of Tampa Bay, Fla., said she had several million dollars of inherited money invested in the firm and added $500,000 earlier this year. A stay-at-home mother with two children, the 46-year-old Ms. Leavitt says she is considering going back to work. "That was my nest egg for the children, and my future. I'll never see much back, I'm sure," she said. Ms. Leavitt said she recently discussed her investment with a friend who told her he was suspicious about the firm's ability to generate such profits amid the economic crisis. "I thought, 'He's probably just jealous,' " said Ms. Leavitt. "We've been with [Mr. Madoff] for 15 years, and it's grown every year at 10%."
I'll close this entry just as I started it:
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
